Gleeson, T., & Paszkowski, D. (2014). Perceptions of scale in hydrology: What do you mean by regional scale? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(1), 99–107.
|
 |
|
Abstract
|
The discipline of hydrology has a long history of research in the practical and theoretical aspects of scaling and scale issues, but little effort has been focused on hydrologists’ perception of the scale terms. What exactly do hydrologists mean when they use the terms “pore scale” or “regional scale”? The application of hydrological research requires clear communication, both within the discipline, and with a broader audience. Quantitative and qualitative data on hydrologists’ perceptions of scale were collected using voluntary written surveys and face-to-face interviews. The results suggest that most hydrologists do not consistently define scale terms in the literature, and that this is a minor impediment when interacting with other disciplines and stakeholders. Yet, surface water and groundwater hydrologists agree, within one to two orders of magnitude, on the length scale for most scale terms. Most respondents suggest that the hydrological community needs to better define the length scale of scale terms. In the short term, hydrologists could more frequently and consistently clarify their own length scales whenever a scale term is used. A common and consistent language of scale for hydrological researchers could better enable communication, research, teaching and outreach. Editor Z.W. Kundzewicz; Associate editor T. WagenerCitation Gleeson, T. and Paszkowski, D., 2013. Perceptions of scale in hydrology: what do you mean by regional scale? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (1), 99–107.
|
